<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Delegates Sponsoring Organizations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://delegates.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://delegates.com</link>
	<description>__Delegates.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>One Shall Not Delegate What They Themselves Cannot Perform</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/one-shall-not-delegate-what-they-themselves-cannot-perform/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/one-shall-not-delegate-what-they-themselves-cannot-perform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Delegation is one of the most important management skills. These logical rules and techniques will help you to delegate well. Good delegation saves you time, develops you people, grooms a successor, and motivates. Poor delegation will cause you frustration, demotivates and confuses the other person, and fails to achieve the task or purpose itself.                                            Delegating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div id="body">
<p>Delegation is one of the most important management skills. These logical rules and techniques will help you to delegate well. Good delegation saves you time, develops you people, grooms a successor, and motivates. Poor delegation will cause you frustration, demotivates and confuses the other person, and fails to achieve the task or purpose itself.<span id="more-75"></span>                                            Delegating is nothing but “Internal Outsourcing”. The main purpose of delegating is “Time Management”&#8230;so that you can concentrate on big&#8230;main assignments, assignments which need your attention.<!--more--> But what can you delegate, is an important question. I am of the opinion that “One shall not delegate what they themselves cannot do”&#8230;that means you can delegate only those things..assignments which you&#8230;yourself are comfortable in doing. When you delegate, the message that you are passing to the other person is that, “Look, I can do this and can do more efficiently but I want you to help me in doing this assignment so that I can concentrate on other issues/assignments”.</p>
<p>Most of the time we have seen bosses delegating those assignments which they themselves are not able to do and then there the message is, “I don&#8217;t know how to do it and hence I want you to do it”. So, now the most important question&#8230;how good are you in delegation.</p>
<p>Relation between Outsourcing and Delegation.</p>
<p>Outsourcing is the transfer or delegation to an external service provider the operation and day-to-day management of a business process. The customer receives a service that performs a distinct business function that fits into the customer&#8217;s overall business operations.</p>
<p>There are two principal types: &#8220;traditional&#8221; outsourcing and &#8220;greenfield&#8221; outsourcing.</p>
<p>In &#8220;traditional&#8221; outsourcing, employees of an enterprise cease to perform the same jobs to the enterprise. Rather, tasks are identified that need to be performed, and the employees are normally hired by the service provider.</p>
<p>In &#8220;greenfield&#8221; outsourcing, the enterprise changes its business processes without any hiring of personnel by the service provider.</p>
<p>Main purposes of Delegation and/or Outsourcing are:</p>
<p>Cut costs</p>
<p>Increase productivity</p>
<p>increase security and reliability</p>
<p>maximize uptime</p>
<p>Concentrate on core competencies</p>
<p>Delegation V/S Empowerment</p>
<p>Delegation is an old idea used in the traditional management model. The idea was to make sure that responsibility and authority were equal for every job. When delegation was implemented correctly, people had the authority that they needed to execute their responsibilities. Limitations of this approach: assigning authority does not mean that someone has the ability, motivation, and understanding necessary to perform.</p>
<p>Empowerment is a core concept of the new management model. In the new-generation adaptive organization, delegation is replaced by empowerment, and responsibility by ownership. Authority and responsibilities are formal aspects or organizing.</p>
<p>They are based upon organizational properties and not individual capabilities. Empowerment and ownership are social aspects of organizing, They are based on efficacy and initiative, and not just on roles and requirements. They belong to people.</p>
<p>Now, continuing with delegation</p>
<p>So, are you SMART in Delegation or SMARTER?</p>
<p>A simple delegation rule is the acronym SMART, or better still, SMARTER. It&#8217;s a quick checklist for proper delegation. Delegated tasks must be:</p>
<p>Specific</p>
<p>Measurable</p>
<p>Agreed</p>
<p>Realistic</p>
<p>Time bound</p>
<p>Ethical</p>
<p>Recorded</p>
<p>Traditional interpretations of the SMARTER acronym use &#8216;Exciting&#8217; or &#8216;Enjoyable&#8217;, however, although a high level of motivation often results when a person achieves and is given recognition for a particular delegated task, which in itself can be exciting and enjoyable, in truth, let&#8217;s be honest, it is not always possible to ensure that all delegated work is truly &#8216;exciting&#8217; or &#8216;enjoyable&#8217; for the recipient. More importantly, the &#8216;Ethical&#8217; aspect is fundamental to everything that we do, assuming you subscribe to such philosophy.</p>
<p>What To Delegate</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t delegate what you, yourself is not able to do.<br />
Don&#8217;t delegate what you can eliminate. If you shouldn&#8217;t be doing an activity, then perhaps you shouldn&#8217;t be giving the activity away to others. Eliminate it.</p>
<p>Delegate routine activities, even though you don&#8217;t want to:</p>
<p>Fact-finding assignments</p>
<p>Preparation of rough drafts of reports</p>
<p>Problem analysis and suggested actions</p>
<p>Collection of data for reports</p>
<p>Photocopying, printing, collating</p>
<p>Data entry</p>
<p>Delegate things that aren&#8217;t part of your core competency. For small businesses, these include accounting, web site design, deliveries, hardware upkeep, software help, graphic design, travel arrangements, patenting, legal issues and even HR functions such as payroll.</p>
<p>Some things you can&#8217;t delegate: performance reviews, discipline, firing.<br />
Create a plan to delegate. Don&#8217;t give out assignments haphazardly.<br />
Invest short term time in training to gain a long term increase in productivity.<br />
Others may end up doing a better job than you can or finding new ways to complete a task.<br />
Delegate, don&#8217;t abdicate. Someone else can do the task, but you&#8217;re still responsible for the completion of it, and for managing the delegation process.</p>
<p>Things to keep in mind&#8230;while delegating</p>
<p>Make sure the standards and the outcome are clear. What needs to be done, when should it be finished and to what degree of quality or detail?<br />
Delegate the objective, not the procedure. Outline the desired results, not the methodology.<br />
Ask people to provide progress reports. Set interim deadlines to see how things are going.</p>
<p>Delegate to the right person. Don&#8217;t always give tasks to the strongest, most experienced or first available person.<br />
Spread delegation around and give people new experiences as part of their training.</p>
<p>Obtain feedback from employees to ensure they feel they&#8217;re being treated appropriately. A simple &#8220;How&#8217;s it going with that new project?&#8221; might be all that&#8217;s needed.</p>
<p>Be sure to delegate the authority along with the responsibility. Don&#8217;t make people come back to you for too many minor approvals.<br />
Trust people to do well and don&#8217;t look over their shoulders or check up with them along the way, unless they ask.<br />
Be prepared to trade short term errors for long term results.<br />
When you finish giving instructions, the last thing to ask is, &#8220;What else do you need to get started?&#8221; They&#8217;ll tell you.<br />
Give praise and feedback at the end of the project, and additional responsibilities.</p>
<p>Delegation as a Process&#8230;Procedure involved in Delegation</p>
<p>Before starting lets understand the various barriers in Delegation</p>
<p>The biggest barrier to delegating is overcoming the entrepreneur&#8217;s curse: insisting on doing it all. That&#8217;s a fatal error that prevents start-ups from growing into viable companies.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how to tell if you&#8217;re digging yourself into a hole. When a friend asks, &#8220;How was work today?&#8221; do you talk about how much work you did? Or do you focus on the work that you coached others to do?</p>
<p>If you discuss how well your employees are &#8220;stepping up&#8221; and &#8220;lightening my load,&#8221; that&#8217;s a good sign. It shows you&#8217;re delegating in a meaningful way. But if you sigh and summarize all the rush jobs you had to handle — and all the fires you had to put out — that indicates you could benefit from more delegation.</p>
<p>Beware of giving the following excuses to avoid delegating:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;It takes too long to explain.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. &#8220;No one on my staff is capable of doing it.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. &#8220;If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself.&#8221;</p>
<p>4. &#8220;My people are already overworked. I can&#8217;t dump anything more on them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which of the above statements have you made to rationalize your lack of delegation?</p>
<p>Although you may offer the above excuses, your real reasons for refusing to delegate may appear below:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;I&#8217;m comfortable doing things myself. If I give that up, then I would wind up operating my company in a way I&#8217;m not comfortable with.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. &#8220;It&#8217;s my company, so it&#8217;s ultimately my job to run everything.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. &#8220;What if the other person messes up? We&#8217;re a young company, and we can&#8217;t afford any mistakes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you think of any other reasons why you don&#8217;t delegate as much as you should?</p>
<p>Why you Should Delegate?</p>
<p>You free yourself to run your business and see the big picture.</p>
<p>1. You develop your employees and make them more valuable.</p>
<p>2. You spread accountability to encourage a stronger, more resilient team.</p>
<p>3. You can respond faster to changes in your business when you can rely on nimble employees to take charge.</p>
<p>Delegation involves three elements:</p>
<p>1. responsibility</p>
<p>2. authority</p>
<p>3. accountability</p>
<p>When you delegate, you distribute responsibility and authority to others while holding them accountable for their performance. The ultimate accountability, however, still lies with you.</p>
<p>THE PROCESS OF DELEGATION</p>
<p>Stage &#8211; I: Choose What to Delegate</p>
<p>Study what kind of job you intend to delegate. Plan how you are going to present the assignment, including your requirements, parameters, authority level, checkpoints, and expectations.</p>
<p>To determine what tasks you should delegate, begin by keeping a log of what you do during the day. After two weeks, review your daily activity log and ask yourself if it truly reflects what you should be doing.</p>
<p>Say you make the most contribution to your firm by focusing on five duties:</p>
<p>1. Courting new customers</p>
<p>2. Mapping out your firm&#8217;s growth strategy</p>
<p>3. Exploring acquisitions and marketing alliances</p>
<p>4. Analyzing new markets for your products or services</p>
<p>5. Coaching employees</p>
<p>If your activity log shows you do not spend the bulk of your time in these five areas, this should spur you to delegate. Squandering your day on minor matters will divert you from what really counts and stymie your company&#8217;s growth.</p>
<p>Do delegate:</p>
<p>1. All routine or even sporadic clerical duties (filing, counting, sorting, routine reports)</p>
<p>2. Making minor decisions</p>
<p>3. Answering routine questions</p>
<p>4. Minor staffing problems such as scheduling</p>
<p>5. Anything your employees are expected to do when you&#8217;re not there</p>
<p>6. Jobs that can develop the employee in other areas for potential promotion</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t delegate:</p>
<p>1. An emergency or short-term task where there&#8217;s not time to explain or train</p>
<p>2. Morale problems</p>
<p>3. A presentation to investors about your company&#8217;s financial performance and future plans</p>
<p>4. A job no one else in the company is qualified to do</p>
<p>5. Personnel issues such as hiring, firing or disciplinary matters</p>
<p>Stage-II: Choose the Right Person to Delegate to</p>
<p>Andrew Carnegie once said, &#8220;The secret of success is not in doing your own work but in recognizing the right man to do it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The key to finding the right person to delegate to is to match skills and personality to the task at hand. As a preliminary exercise, ask each of your employees these questions:</p>
<p>1. What would you like to learn more about at this company?</p>
<p>2. What areas would you like to expand your skills?</p>
<p>3. What parts of this company do you feel you know the most/least about?</p>
<p>4. Are you eager to change your current job duties in any way? If so, how?</p>
<p>Armed with the answers, you can delegate duties to people who are receptive to accepting them.</p>
<p>Also consider the work habits of individuals on your team. Some people may need lots of explanation, while others merely want to know your expectations and any guidelines before they&#8217;re left alone to &#8220;get it done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stage-III: Communicate What You Want Done</p>
<p>Rather than rush to give &#8220;do this, do that&#8221; orders, effective delegation consists of explaining the WHAT and the WHY:</p>
<p>WHAT do you want the employee to do?</p>
<p>WHY did you choose them to do it?</p>
<p>When you delegate, include a &#8220;WHAT-WHY statement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like you to make ten survey calls to find out what our customers think of our new product. Given your excellent phone manner, I think you would represent us well and get people talking.</p>
<p>We need to turn in some financial information to state regulators by next Friday, and I want you to confirm all the numbers are up-to-date and accurate in our financial exhibits. You&#8217;re a stickler for details, so I&#8217;m depending on you to crosscheck everything.</p>
<p>Can you write a letter to our suppliers about our new purchasing policies? You&#8217;re familiar with our expense control measures and you&#8217;re a good writer, so I think you would be perfect to write this letter and provide the proper context.</p>
<p>Before delegating your next project, compose a WHAT-WHY statement:</p>
<p>Rehearse this statement out loud to see how it sounds. You may want to practice with a trusted adviser and get feedback.<br />
When you&#8217;ve polished your WHAT-WHY statement, you&#8217;re almost ready to delegate. But first, prepare answers to these three questions:</p>
<p>1. Who should the employee work with on this assignment? Who&#8217;s available to offer help? 2. What resources or tools are available? 3. What&#8217;s the deadline?</p>
<p>Weave the answers to the above questions into your instruction. Encourage the employee to take notes, especially to confirm the deadline so there&#8217;s no misunderstanding about what you expect at that time.</p>
<p>The final step in communicating what you want done is to gauge the employee&#8217;s willingness to comply. End by asking, &#8220;Are you excited about doing this?&#8221; or &#8220;Do you feel comfortable tackling this?&#8221;</p>
<p>You might also ask for input on how the individual intends to get started. Example: &#8220;How do you plan to approach this?&#8221;</p>
<p>Stage-IV: Follow Up</p>
<p>Establish checkpoints to monitor progress. This discussion should be a collaborative process where you reach mutual agreement on how you intend to follow up.</p>
<p>You have three options to track an employee&#8217;s work:</p>
<p>1. Scrutinize and approve every step of the assignment before the worker proceeds to the next stage.</p>
<p>Advantage: You ensure the project is completed satisfactorily, and you can satisfy your urge to know what&#8217;s going on throughout the process. Many control-oriented entrepreneurs prefer to keep a close watch on an assignment after they delegate it, especially if it involves lots of details or complicated steps.</p>
<p>Disadvantage: You might make the employee feel stupid by signing off on each step. You risk showing you don&#8217;t trust others to think for themselves without your constant oversight. Plus, it takes more of your time.</p>
<p>2. Set a date for the individual to complete the work. Instruct the employee to come to you with any questions along the way; otherwise, you stay out of it.</p>
<p>Advantage: You give the worker a chance to operate independently without lots of interference. Your hands-off role also frees you to do what&#8217;s most important.</p>
<p>Disadvantage: You may be in for an unpleasant surprise if the work isn&#8217;t done by the due date or it&#8217;s done incorrectly, and you may have no way of knowing how it&#8217;s going unless the employee chooses to keep you informed.</p>
<p>3. Designate a manager who&#8217;s in charge of overseeing the employee&#8217;s work. This is really double delegation: you&#8217;re assigning work to someone and assigning a supervisor to monitor that work.</p>
<p>Advantage: You increase the odds the work will get done properly — without having to spend time tracking it yourself. You can also give your team leaders a chance to expand their supervisory role by making them the &#8220;contact person&#8221; for your employee and by having them follow the worker&#8217;s progress.</p>
<p>Disadvantage: In a fast-growing business, you may not have the luxury of putting a manager in charge of monitoring an employee&#8217;s work. And that manager may not have the time to track the project carefully or provide meaningful help to the employee.</p>
<p>Before concluding&#8230;lets do an introspection and lets check how good or bad you are in delegation.</p>
<p>Answer each statement with the corresponding number using this code: 1 = always 2 = sometimes 3 = never</p>
<p>___I find that my employees consistently look for ways to relieve the pressure that top management faces — without being asked.</p>
<p>_____I&#8217;m free to &#8220;think big&#8221; because my colleagues and employees handle all the daily operational stuff.</p>
<p>_____As my company continues to grow rapidly, I&#8217;m totally comfortable letting go and putting others in charge of pieces of my business — rather than clinging to control.</p>
<p>_____I prefer to spend 30 minutes training an employee to do a new task than just doing it myself in five minutes.</p>
<p>_____I say to an employee &#8220;Let me show you how to do that&#8221; far more than I think to myself &#8220;If I don&#8217;t do it, it won&#8217;t get done right.&#8221;</p>
<p>_____I look for opportunities to praise my managers for delegating to their workers.</p>
<p>Review your answers. If your total score is 6-8, then you&#8217;re an excellent delegator. This Business Builder will reinforce much of what you&#8217;re already doing and introduce you to some new techniques.</p>
<p>If your score is 9-14, you&#8217;re on the road to becoming an effective delegator. But you need to raise your awareness and make a more concerted effort to coach others to plug holes and take on more responsibility.</p>
<p>For those who score over 14, you&#8217;re not alone. And you&#8217;re honest! Many entrepreneurs need to confront the fact that they just can&#8217;t do it all, and that assigning jobs to others is a vital part of building a business. Ask any legendary business builder — including our own Edward Lowe — to identify a key to transforming a great idea into a thriving enterprise, and here&#8217;s the answer you&#8217;ll hear: harness the drive, skills, and talents of every employee.</p>
<p>Conclusion:</p>
<p>Managers delegate work not to just relieve their workload, but to allow the employees they supervise to grow professionally. Effective delegation is a two-way discussion and understanding. Be clear about the delegated task, give employee(s) an opportunity to ask questions, monitor progress and offer assistance as needed. Use effective delegation to benefit both yourself and the person to whom you delegate. DOs and DON&#8217;T of Delegation&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>DOs</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Chose delegates based on a fair and objective assessment of his or her skills and abilities in relation to the requirement of the task </p>
<p>Give precise instructions; use simple procedures; show employees how to do something and explain why it is done that way</p>
<p>Show how each delegation contributes to organizational goals</p>
<p>Clarify expected results</p>
<p>Develop together standards of performance; recognize superior performance</p>
<p>Discuss problems; answer questions; seek employees&#8217; ideas about how to do the job</p>
<p>Be supportive; exhibit trust; keep your promises</p>
<p>Praise positive achievements in public</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>DON&#8217;Ts </strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t delegate in a haphazard fashion </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t over-exercise your power; don&#8217;t try to dominate the delegates; be rather a leader than a mentor</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t criticize employees in front of others</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t overreact to problems or mistakes</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t over-control the performance</p>
<p> </p>
<p>That is all I have to say about delegation as “Internal Outsourcing”. Lets discuss. Looking forward to your inputs/comments.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/one-shall-not-delegate-what-they-themselves-cannot-perform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative &#8211; Liberal</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/conservative-liberal/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/conservative-liberal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people do not really understand the difference between a conservative and a liberal.  How do you really know which side of the spectrum you fall on?  In this article, we are going to explain some of the differences, so that as political figures are discussing conservative and liberal ideals you know exactly what is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: left;">Many people do not really understand the difference between a conservative and a liberal.  How do you really know which side of the spectrum you fall on?  In this article, we are going to explain some of the differences, so that as political figures are discussing conservative and liberal ideals you know exactly what is going on. The first side of the issue is the conservative side.  The conservatives tends to want to preserve things they way they are, for example they dislike change, and do not want things to change in the way the country is run, how people come into power, and how civil rights are handed out.<span id="more-61"></span>  Conservatives appreciate in real terms the importance of building and maintaining the economy to the benefit of society as a whole.  Many conservatives are also considered to appreciate having an exclusive inner circle that controls the entire country, although in mainstream politics this is rarely a salient feature.</p>
<p> Many conservatives also live by the ideals that institutions that have been successful rather than dwelling on mistakes.  This has the effect of working towards improvement in efficiency, which is another key factor of Conservative thought.  Many conservatives do not think technology is our friend; they feel that technology should not be a part of government standards and ideas based on the inefficiency it brings.  Many conservatives are also very cautious people, which is reflected in the opinions and decisions of their politics.</p>
<p> Liberals on the other hand are very much different.  Most liberals are very open to change, almost to a fault; they do not mind the ideas of change as long as it is for a perceived good cause, even where there is no practical utilitarian upshot.  Liberals tend to be willing to take more risks than most conservatives are in the whimsical pursuit of change.  Most liberals are also very tolerant of behavior different from their own, as well as they are willing to open their minds to new ideas and concepts easier than the conservative counterparts.  Liberals also like to push for change without necessarily having a justification for their actions.</p>
<p> Liberals tend to be very progressively thinking people, whom are quite open to the new ideas of technology in terms of normal daily life, as well as in the role of assisting the government in managing the country to the best of our ability.  However, their emphasis on extreme individual freedom means a more distant form of governance that leaves society to regulate itself without much intervention.  This has led to numerous political and social problems for liberal governments across the world.</p>
<p> While there are some major differences in the two sides, there are also many people who fall somewhere in the middle.  Many people are able to pull their comfort zone from taking pieces of each side.  While some people are hesitant of change, they are able to accept change in order to make things better for everyone.  For example, women’s rights were the result of change.  Many conservatives were against the ideals of women being allowed to vote.  On the flip side, some liberals are in favor of the legalization of drugs, and are wholeheartedly against government regulation in the way we live our lives.</p>
<p>While there are many differences in the ideals of the two groups, there is also a bond that forges from each side being determined to make life the best possible for the people in the areas with which they are concerned.  Neither side sets out to hurt the other side, nor the people they are responsible for helping.  There are times when the goals of both sides do come together nicely and result in wonderful progress for our cities, nation, and country as a whole.  Looking to the future, we can expect both sides to continue to change and progress as things change and the future becomes reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/conservative-liberal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet and Politics</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/internet-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/internet-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, political figures relied upon the news in the form of television stations and even newspapers to release information to the public, i.e. direct to the electorate.  Now with the invention of the internet, more political figures are releasing their own information.  How does this affect the release of information?  Does this add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: left;">In the past, political figures relied upon the news in the form of television stations and even newspapers to release information to the public, i.e. direct to the electorate.  Now with the invention of the internet, more political figures are releasing their own information.  How does this affect the release of information?  Does this add to the impact of law and government on society, or is this merely a direct root to brainwashing the public. <span id="more-54"></span> Furthermore, is it good to use political figures time releasing information when they should be enacting change?  In this article we will look at the relationship between the internet and politics, and whether the move towards more accessibility and greater personal accounting is beneficial to democracy and government.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The correct answers are never easy to find, however with some work, analysis and thought it is possible to come up with the right answer.  The right answer is there is no answer &#8211; isn’t that horrific.  Each politician has different means of how comfortable they are on the internet.  Using the internet has allowed some to maintain a closer proximity to the people they represent, while others have used it as a means to avoid personal contact with the people.  Either way, the Internet is obviously a powerful campaigning tool, and most politicians seemed to have realized and utilized this within their own campaigns. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Many politicians are taking the internet and using it as a means of keeping a continuous stream of contact with the media, the people they represent, and everyone else.  The internet has allowed the political figures who use it the ability to quickly communicate with everyone whenever important information is available.  This makes them more accessible to the ordinary man in the street, which has never been possible through any other medium in the past.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Using the internet to communicate directly with people has improved the accuracy of the information that comes down in the political reigns.  Being assured of accurate information is why many prefer to receive the information directly from the lawmakers whom they elected.  Many times, it is possible to find the information in more detail online, and with less hassle and false facts. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Couple the increased communication with the fact that each day, millions log onto the internet and it makes it the perfect place for candidates to hone their campaign skills to help increase their visual image in the public eye.  Most voters want a political figure they can find easily so they are able to do research to find the candidate that they truly believe in without spending hours doing research.  Furthermore, the internet allows politicians to point their campaigns directly at a completely new demographic that had never before been tapped into.  This is unleashing a whole new generation of voters eager to make the difference, which is working wonders for the politicians involved, and of course their savvy communications managers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Many voters have embraced the idea of being able to show support for their political parties from the comforts of their home over the internet.  Politicians are also enjoying the ability to quickly communicate and using various social websites as well as the websites for their offices to keep a good flow of communication open with voters.  With everything compiled it is a wonderful age, where the internet is able to bring politicians and voters much closer together, while still allowing the politicians to be in Washington, or where their office is performing their job.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>With the ease of the internet, politicians are able to communicate with the public from anywhere, giving them more time to communicate greater amounts of information to the public, as well as be able to gather feedback from the public in regards to the wishes of the majority.  Overall, it is a wonderful time and a wonderful addition to the political world since the invent of the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/internet-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pope</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/the-pope/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/the-pope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pope governs the Catholic Church through the Roman Curia. The Roman Curia consists of a complex of offices that administer church affairs at the highest level, including the Secretariat of State, nine Congregations, three Tribunals, eleven Pontifical Councils, and seven Pontifical Commissions. The Secretariat of State, under the Cardinal Secretary of State, directs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignright" title="pope" src="http://delegates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/pope.jpg" alt="pope" width="83" height="94" />The Pope governs the Catholic Church through the Roman Curia. The Roman Curia consists of a complex of offices that administer church affairs at the highest level, including the Secretariat of State, nine Congregations, three Tribunals, eleven Pontifical Councils, and seven Pontifical Commissions. The Secretariat of State, under the Cardinal Secretary of State, directs and coordinates the Curia. The current incumbent, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, is the See&#8217;s equivalent of a prime minister. Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, Secretary of the Section for Relations with States of the Secretariat of State, acts as the Holy See&#8217;s foreign minister. Bertone and Mamberti were named in their respective roles by Pope Benedict XVI in September 2006.<span id="more-44"></span></p>
<p>The Secretariat of State is the only body of the Curia that is situated within Vatican City. The others are in buildings in different parts of Rome that have extraterritorial rights similar to those of embassies.</p>
<p>Among the most active of the major Curial institutions are the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which oversees the Catholic Church&#8217;s doctrine; the Congregation for Bishops, which coordinates the appointment of bishops worldwide; the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, which oversees all missionary activities; and the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, which deals with international peace and social issues.</p>
<p>Three tribunals are responsible for judicial power. The Sacra Rota is responsible for normal appeals, including decrees of nullity for marriages, with the Apostolic Signatura being the administrative court of appeal and highest ecclesiastical court. The Apostolic Penitentiary is different from those two and, instead of dealing with contentious cases, issues absolutions, dispensations, and indulgences.</p>
<p>The Prefecture for the Economic Affairs of the Holy See coordinates the finances of the Holy See departments and supervises the administration of all offices, whatever be their degree of autonomy, that manage these finances. The most important of these is the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See.</p>
<p>The Prefecture of the Papal Household is responsible for the organization of the papal household, audiences, and ceremonies (apart from the strictly liturgical part).</p>
<p>The Holy See does not dissolve upon a Pope&#8217;s death or resignation. It instead operates under a different set of laws sede vacante. During this interregnum, the heads of the dicasteries of the Roman Curia (such as the prefects of congregations) cease immediately to hold office, the only exceptions being the Major Penitentiary, who continues his important role regarding absolutions and dispensations, and the Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, who administers the temporalities (i.e., properties and finances) of the See of St. Peter during this period. The government of the See, and therefore of the Catholic Church, then falls to the College of Cardinals. Canon law prohibits the College and the Camerlengo from introducing any innovations or novelties in the government of the Church during this period</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/the-pope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican Party of the United States of America utilizes a similar system with slightly different terminology, employing pledged and unpledged delegates. Of the total 2,380 Republican delegates, 1,719 are pledged delegates, who as with the Democratic Party, are elected at the state or local level. To become the Republican Party nominee, the candidate must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignleft" title="republican" src="http://delegates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/republican.jpg" alt="republican" width="145" height="145" />The Republican Party of the United States of America utilizes a similar system with slightly different terminology, employing pledged and unpledged delegates. Of the total 2,380 Republican delegates, 1,719 are pledged delegates, who as with the Democratic Party, are elected at the state or local level. To become the Republican Party nominee, the candidate must win a simple majority of 1,191 of the 2,380 total delegates at the Republican National Convention, held in Saint Paul, Minnesota in September 2008.<span id="more-41"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">A majority of the unpledged delegates are elected much like the pledged delegates, and are likely to be committed to a specific candidate. Many of the other unpledged delegates automatically claim the delegate status either by virtue of their position as a party chair or national party committee person. This group is known as unpledged RNC member delegates.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignright" title="Republicans" src="http://delegates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Republicans.jpg" alt="Republicans" width="123" height="124" />The process by which delegates are awarded to a candidate will vary from state to state. Many states use a winner-take-all system, where popular vote determines the winning candidate for that state, while a few other use a proportional representation. While the Republican National Committee does not require a 15% minimum threshold, individual state parties may however impart such a threshold.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The unpledged RNC member delegates are free to vote for any candidate and are not bound by the electoral votes of their state. The majority of the unpledged delegates of those who are elected or chosen are technically free to vote for any candidate, however they are likely to be committed to one specifically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic party of the United States of America uses pledged delegates and super delegates. A candidate for the Democratic nominee must win a majority of combined delegate votes at the Democratic National Convention, held in Denver, Colorado in August 2008.
Pledged delegates are elected or chosen at the state or local level, with the understanding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignleft" title="democrat" src="http://delegates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/democrat.jpg" alt="democrat" width="122" height="132" />The Democratic party of the United States of America uses pledged delegates and super delegates. A candidate for the Democratic nominee must win a majority of combined delegate votes at the Democratic National Convention, held in Denver, Colorado in August 2008.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Pledged delegates are elected or chosen at the state or local level, with the understanding that they will support a particular candidate at the convention. Pledged delegates are however not actually bound to vote for that candidate, thus the candidates are allowed to periodically review the list of delegates and eliminate any of those they feel would not be supportive. Currently there are 3,253 pledged delegates.<span id="more-37"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Of the 4,047 total Democratic delegates, 794 are superdelegates, which are usually Democratic members of Congress, governors, former Presidents, and other party leaders. They are not required to indicate preference for a candidate.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The Democratic Party uses a proportional representation to determine how many delegates each candidate is awarded in each state. For example, a candidate who wins 40% of a state&#8217;s vote in the primary election will win 40% of that state&#8217;s delegates; however, a candidate must win at least 15% of the primary vote, or they win no delegates. If a candidate wins 14% of the primary election, they receive zero delegates. There is no process to win super delegates, since they can vote for whomever they please. A candidate needs to win a simple majority of total delegates to earn the Democratic nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are Delegates</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/what-are-delegates/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/what-are-delegates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><center><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/er0xmCrx2Ho&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x2b405b&#038;color2=0x6b8ab6&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/er0xmCrx2Ho&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x2b405b&#038;color2=0x6b8ab6&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object><c/center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/what-are-delegates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delegate Organizations</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/delegate-organizations/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/delegate-organizations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A delegate is a person sponsoring an organization for a government, charity, an NGO,or a trade union at a meeting or conference between organizations of the same levels (e.g. trade talks or an environmental summit between governments, an arbitration over an industrial dispute, or a meeting of student unions from individual colleges at a national [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: left;">A delegate is a person sponsoring an organization for a government, charity, an NGO,or a trade union at a meeting or conference between organizations of the same levels (e.g. trade talks or an environmental summit between governments, an arbitration over an industrial dispute, or a meeting of student unions from individual colleges at a national student union conference.<span id="more-3"></span>Delegate is the title of a person elected to the United States House of Representatives to serve the interests of an organized United States territory, at present only overseas or the District of Columbia, but historically in most cases in a portion of North America as precursor to one or more of the present states of the union. Delegates have powers similar to that of Representatives, including the right to vote in committee, but have no right to take part in the floor votes in which the full house actually decides whether the proposal is carried.<!--more--></p>
<p>A similar mandate is held in a few cases under the style Resident commissioner.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-5" title="delegate logo" src="http://delegates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/delegate-logo.jpg" alt="delegate logo" width="97" height="130" />Delegate is also the title given to individuals elected to the lower houses of the bicameral legislative bodies of the states of Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia.</p>
<p>Members of other parliamentary assemblies, such as the Continental Congress or the New York State Constitutional.</p>
<p>Members of a body charged with writing or revising a foundational or other basic governmental document such as members of a constitutional convention are usually referred to as &#8220;delegates&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/delegate-organizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Deficit</title>
		<link>http://delegates.com/obamas-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://delegates.com/obamas-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delegates.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VUgf2qyhLtI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VUgf2qyhLtI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delegates.com/obamas-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
